[an error occurred while processing this directive] 世界地质 2020, 39(4) 912-920,959 DOI:   10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2020.04.017  ISSN: 1004-5589 CN: 22-1111/P

本期目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索                                                            [打印本页]   [关闭]
工程地质
扩展功能
本文信息
Supporting info
PDF(7386KB)
[HTML全文]
参考文献[PDF]
参考文献
服务与反馈
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
引用本文
Email Alert
文章反馈
浏览反馈信息
本文关键词相关文章
滑坡
稳定性分析
数值模拟
治理措施
本文作者相关文章
宋京雷
刘刚
施威
徐成华
张春雨
潘长胜
PubMed
Article by Song J
Article by Liu G
Article by Shi W
Article by Xu C
Article by Zhang C
Article by Pan C
某水库大坝西侧山体滑坡稳定性分析及治理措施
宋京雷1, 刘刚2, 施威2, 徐成华2, 张春雨3, 潘长胜3
1. 江苏省地质调查研究院, 南京 210018;
2. 江苏省地质矿产局 第一地质大队, 南京 210041;
3. 河海大学 地球科学与工程学院, 南京 211100
摘要: 以某水库大坝西侧山体滑坡为研究对象,采用FLAC3D数值模拟软件分析了滑坡治理前后天然和暴雨工况下的滑坡稳定性。稳定性分析结果表明,治理前在天然工况下,最大位移约4.71 cm,坡体基本稳定,但在暴雨工况下,坡体滑动剧烈,最大位移达到4.01 m,坡体处于不稳定状态;治理加固后天然工况下最大位移减小到2.08 cm,暴雨工况下坡体最大位移减小到10.42 cm,均明显减小;抗滑桩治理滑坡效果较为理想,达到预期治理效果。
关键词 滑坡   稳定性分析   数值模拟   治理措施  
Stability analysis and treatment measures of mountain landslide on west side of a reservoir dam
SONG Jing-lei1, LIU Gang2, SHI Wei2, XU Cheng-hua2, ZHANG Chun-yu3, PAN Chang-sheng3
1. Jiangsu Province Geological Survey Institute, Nanjing 210018, China;
2. The 1st Geological Brigade of Jiangsu Geology and Mineral Exploration Brigade, Nanjing 210041, China;
3. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
Abstract: Taking the mountain landslide on the west side of a reservoir dam as the research object, the authors use FLAC3D numerical simulation software to analyze the stability of landslide under natural and heavy rain conditions before and after landslide treatment. The results show that the maximum displacement before treatment is about 4.71 cm under natural conditions and the slope body is basically stable. However, under the condition of heavy rain, the slope is severely slipped, the maximum displacement reaches 4.01 m, and the slope is in an unstable state. After treatment and reinforcement, the maximum displacement of the slope decreases to 2.08 cm under natural conditions, and 10.42 cm under heavy rain conditions. Anti-slide piles are ideal for controlling landslides and achieving the desired treatment effect.
Keywords: landslide   stability analysis   numerical simulation   treatment measures  
收稿日期 2019-08-13 修回日期 2020-06-22 网络版发布日期  
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2020.04.017
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(41672258)、江苏省国土厅科技计划项目(2018045)资助。

通讯作者: 潘长胜(1995-),男,硕士研究生,地质工程专业,主要从事地质体稳定性研究工作。E-mail:1458647033@qq.com
作者简介:
作者Email: 1458647033@qq.com

参考文献:
[1] 王鑫, 许万忠, 罗启忠. 徽县西寺村滑坡稳定性分析与评价[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2019,30(1):10-18. WANG Xin, XU Wan-zhong, LUO Qi-zhong. Analysis and evaluation of landslide stability in Xisi village, Huixian County[J].Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation,2019,30(1):10-18.
[2] 张岩岩, 文海家, 麻超超, 等. 基于多源数据的蔡家坝特大型滑坡成因机制研究及稳定性评价[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(9):61-76. ZHANG Yan-yan, WEN Hai-jia, MA Chao-chao, et al. Failure mechanism and stability analysis of huge landslide of Caijiaba based on multi-source data[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2018, 37(9):61-76.
[3] 向越. 基于FLAC3D的有限元法和不平衡推力法对四川某浅表层土质滑坡的稳定性分析[J]. 四川建筑, 2018, 38(6):89-92. XIANG Yue. Stability analysis of a shallow soil landslide in Sichuan Province based on FLAC3D finite element method and imbalanced thrust force method[J]. Sichuan Architecture, 2018, 38(6):89-92.
[4] 张骞棋. 基于Geostudio与Flac3D的浅层滑坡稳定性研究[J]. 中国锰业, 2018, 36(6):170-174. ZHANG Qian-qi. A study on GeoStudio and Flac3D numerical simulation shallow landslide stability of earth-rock accumulation[J]. China's Manganese Industry, 2018, 36(6):170-174.
[5] 王刚. 基于FLAC3D的土质边坡锚杆加固优化设计[J]. 山西建筑, 2017,43(10):92-93. WANG Gang. The reinforcement optimization design of soil slope anchor rod based on FLAC3D[J]. Shanxi Architecture,2017,43(10):92-93.
[6] 蒋中明,熊小虎,曾铃.基于FLAC3D平台的边坡非饱和降雨入渗分析[J].岩土力学,2014,35(3):855-861. JIANG Zhong-ming, XIONG Xiao-hu, ZENG Ling. Unsaturated seepage analysis of slope under rainfall condition based on FLAC3D[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2014,35(3):855-861.
[7] 汪儒鸿, 周海清, 彭国园. 土体结构性对突发性边坡失稳的控制作用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2018, 29(5):26-31. WANG Ru-hong, ZHOU Hai-qing, PENG Guo-yuan. Analysis of the sudden slope instability controlled by the soil structure[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2018, 29(5):26-31.
[8] 胡时友, 蔡强, 李乾坤,等. 抗滑短桩加固滑坡体模型试验三维数值模拟分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2018,26(4):969-977. HU Shi-you, CAI Qiang, LI Qian-kun, et al. Three dimensional FEM simulation of slope reinforcement by short anti-sliding pile[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2018,26(4):969-977.
[9] 蒋权, 陈希良, 肖江剑, 等. 云南黄坪库区滑坡运动及其失稳模式的离散元模拟[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2018,29(3):53-59. JIANG Quan, CHEN Xi-liang, XIAO Jiang-jian, et al. Discrete element numerical simulation and analysis of Yunnan Huangping reservoir areas landslide and its failure mode[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2018,29(3):53-59.
[10] 李嘉雨, 毛邦燕, 陈亮, 等. 基于3D EC模拟的既有铁路单体滑坡危险性分区与评价:以川黔线裁缝岩滑坡为例[J]. 铁道勘察, 2019, 45(1):44-50. LI Jia-yu, MAO Bang-yan, CHEN Liang, et al. The hazard division and evaluation of single landslide based on 3 dimension distinct element simulation of the existing Chuan-Qian railway[J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying, 2019, 45(1):44-50.
本刊中的类似文章
1.于泽瑞,方石,王岩,杜军,陈洋.综合物探在研究吉林长白大湖滑坡成因机制中的应用[J]. 世界地质, 2022,41(2): 373-385
2.李强,卜青锋.油页岩热膨胀影响因素及防膨胀措施研究[J]. 世界地质, 2021,40(4): 955-963
3.李伟,李明,理继红,袁崇铭,宋京雷,张丽. 江苏残坡积土质滑坡预警模型和判据研究[J]. 世界地质, 2021,40(3): 632-637
4.贾振杨,李刚,刘正宏,冯帆. 花岗岩卸荷节理形成机制数值模拟[J]. 世界地质, 2021,40(3): 594-603
5.刘四新,宋梓豪,程建远,蒋必辞. 利用钻孔雷达探测煤矿井下顶底板界面的数值模拟研究[J]. 世界地质, 2021,40(3): 711-720
6.赵熠,张延军,邓浩,倪金. 大连某围填海造陆场地碎石土性质及地表变形计算[J]. 世界地质, 2021,40(1): 185-192
7.郝大海, 姚玉增, 关长庆, 付建飞.基于高分辨率遥感技术的辽宁大孤山铁矿排土场滑坡灾害评价[J]. 世界地质, 2020,39(4): 937-945
8.方文凯, 王常明, 樊克.花岗岩残积土地区边坡锚固中锚杆长度及间距的数值优化研究[J]. 世界地质, 2020,39(2): 429-436
9.孙旭, 薛林福, 王英英.油页岩原位开采生烃过程数值模拟及井位讨论[J]. 世界地质, 2019,38(3): 759-766
10.刘泽宇, 刘小杨, 牛明璇, 马建雄, 薛林福.油页岩原位加热温度场测温误差的评价[J]. 世界地质, 2019,38(2): 448-453
11.许耘嘉, 王常明, 罗云烈, 匡少华, 刘慧明.特大桥主塔桩基承载性状及其岸坡稳定性数值分析[J]. 世界地质, 2019,38(2): 499-506
12.张谦, 张延军, 于子望, 张通, 张雨, 罗银飞.煤层开采后覆岩稳定性物理模型及数值模拟[J]. 世界地质, 2019,38(1): 293-301
13.李洪建, 韩立国, 刘定进, 巩向博.基于逐元算法的地震勘探高精度谱元法数值模拟[J]. 世界地质, 2018,37(1): 276-281
14.张汝凯, 张晓培, 吕守航, 陈兵兵, 王杰.三维高密度电阻率法在堤坝工程中的模拟试验[J]. 世界地质, 2016,35(4): 1133-1137
15.李伟, 宋京雷, 喻永祥, 孙立佳, 袁玮健.无锡市雪浪山滑坡监测及诱发因素分析[J]. 世界地质, 2016,35(4): 1164-1168

Copyright by 世界地质