Global Geology 2016, 19(2) 102-108 DOI:     ISSN: 1673-9736 CN: 22-1371/P

Current Issue | Archive | Search                                                            [Print]   [Close]
����
Information and Service
This Article
Supporting info
PDF(561KB)
[HTML]
Reference
Service and feedback
Email this article to a colleague
Add to Bookshelf
Add to Citation Manager
Cite This Article
Email Alert
Keywords
metal ore
random media
finite difference method
pseudo- spectral method
Authors
LIU Dongyu
HAN Liguo
ZHANG Pan and XU Dexin
PubMed
Article by LIU Dongyu
Article by HAN Liguo
Article by ZHANG Pan and XU Dexin

Comparison of finite difference and pseudo- spectral methods in forward modelling based on metal ore model of random media

College of Geo- Exploration Science and Technology��Jilin University��Changchun 130026��China

Abstract��

With more applications of seismic exploration in metal ore exploration��forward modelling of seismic wave has become more important in metal ore�� Finite difference method and pseudo- spectral method are two im- portant methods of wave- field simulation�� ��esults of previous studies show that both methods have distinct ad- vantages and disadvantages: Finite difference method has high precision but its dispersion is serious; pseudo- spectral method considers both computational efficiency and precision but has less precision than finite- diffe- rence�� The authors consider the complex structural characteristics of the metal ore��furthermore add random media in order to simulate the complex effects produced by metal ore for wave field�� First��the study introduced the theories of random media and two forward modelling methods�� Second��it compared the simulation results of two methods on fault model�� Then the authors established a complex metal ore model��added random media and compared computational efficiency and precision�� As a result��it is found that finite difference method is better than pseudo- spectral method in precision and boundary treatment��but the computational efficiency of pseudo- spectral method is slightly higher than the finite difference method��

Keywords�� metal ore   random media   finite difference method   pseudo- spectral method  
Received  Revised  Online:  
DOI:
Fund:
Corresponding Authors:
Email:
About author:

References��
Similar articles
1��LI Yong, REN Yunsheng, HAO Yujie, YANG Qun.Ore-forming fluid characteristics and genesis of vein-type lead-zinc mineralization of Xiaohongshilazi deposit,Jilin Province, China[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(4): 191-199
2��WANG Yang, SUN Fengyue, GAO Hongchang, HE Shuyue, QIAN Ye, XU Chenghan.Geochronology and geochemistry of Hutouya monzonitic granite of Qimantage, Qinghai[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(4): 208-216
3��LIU Hang, ZHU Jianwei, CHEN Jingwu.Application of sedimentary pyrite in paleo-environment:a case study of Meihe Formation[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(4): 229-236
4��WANG Zhongcheng, LU Xiaoping, ZHAO Juan, TAO Junyu, CHEN Mingjian.Dating for Jifanggou metamorphic complex in central Jilin and its tectonic implications[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(4): 200-207
5��JING Siliang, LU Qi, WANG Dian.Seismic inversion modeling method for faulted basins:a case study of Liaohe Beach in Bijialing region[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(4): 253-258
6��LIU Caihua, QU Xin, FENG Xuan, TIAN You, LIU Yang, QIAO Hanqing, WANG Shiyu.Application of high-frequency magnetotelluric method in porphyry copper deposit exploration:a case study of Duobaoshan deposit area[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(4): 246-252
7��YIN Yue, WANG Li, SUN Xia, JIANG Hefang, LI Liang.U-Pb geochronology, geochemistry and tectonic implications ofdiorite from Nangnimsan of Mehe in northern Da Hinggan Mountains[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(4): 217-228
8��WU You, SHAN Xuanlong, YI Jian.Volcanic edifices of Yingcheng Formation in Changling fault depression of Songliao Basin and their seismic identification[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(4): 237-245
9��Nareerat Boonchai, Marc Philippe, Paul A. Carling, Lyubov Meshkova.A preliminary investigation of fossil wood from Lower Mekong Basin of Southeast Asia[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(3): 131-143
10��GONG Qiming, HAN Liguo, ZHOU Jinju.Elastic reverse time migration based on vector wavefield decomposition[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(3): 184-190
11��YUAN Zhiyi, ZENG Zhaofa, JIANG Dandan, HUAI Nan, ZHOU Fei.Multi-component joint inversion of gravity gradient based on fast forward calculation[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(3): 176-183
12��ZHANG Junyi, LI Bile, ZHAO Guoquan, NING Chuanqi, SUN Jing, WANG Guozhi.Geochemistry, U-Pb, Hf isotopic characteristics and geological significance of Zhalaxiageyong trachydacite in Tuotuohe area, Qinghai[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(3): 153-163
13��LEI Honglei, ZHANG Yanjun, WU Fan, HU Zhongjun, YU Ziwang, ZHU Chengcheng, LÜ Tianqi.Parallel numerical simulation on CO2 geologic storage in Ordos Basin, China[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(3): 164-169
14��Seyed Ahmad Babazadeh, Seyedeh Malihe Hamidzadeh.Biostratigraphy of Asmari Formation in Ghare Agha seyed of Farsan region, Chaharmahale Bakhtiari Province, Iran[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(3): 144-152
15��YANG Guang, FAN Yeyu, LIU Changli.Gas accumulation mechanism in Denglouku Formation of Changling fault depression, southern Songliao Basin, China[J]. Global Geology, 2017,20(3): 170-175

Copyright by Global Geology