Global Geology 2022, 25(1) 34-40 DOI:     ISSN: 1673-9736 CN: 22-1371/P

Current Issue | Archive | Search                                                            [Print]   [Close]
Information and Service
This Article
Supporting info
PDF(310KB)
[HTML]
Reference
Service and feedback
Email this article to a colleague
Add to Bookshelf
Add to Citation Manager
Cite This Article
Email Alert
Keywords
SIMO antenna
antenna design
coupling
return loss
Authors
SHEN Jian
PubMed
Article by Shen J

Research on influencing factors of coupling in SIMO antenna

SHEN Jian

College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China

Abstract

In the process of radar data acquisition, limited amount of information can be provided to postprocessing interpretation by the data acquisition method of single-input and single-output, however, the location and physical parameter information of geological body can be obtained more accurately by using Multi-Input Multi-Output (MIMO) antenna with multiple transmitters and multiple receivers. Especially when collecting borehole radar data and the aperture is very narrow, but the antenna is required to be able to ensure better results in a larger frequency band, therefore, the size of the antenna will be greatly challenged. Meanwhile, the close arrangement of multiple transmitting and receiving antennas will inevitably affect the signal radiation. Based on the borehole radar, this paper simulates and optimizes the Single-Input Multi-Output antenna (SIMO antenna) , the size of which meets the aperture requirements, using HFSS antenna simulation software, and explores the factors affecting the antenna return loss and isolation. Among them, the radius of the dipole has little effect on the return loss and isolation, whereas increasing the number of receiving antennas or increasing the transceiver distance will significantly affect the antenna coupling, with a significant reduction in the amplitude of isolation.

Keywords SIMO antenna   antenna design   coupling   return loss  
Received  Revised  Online:  
DOI:
Fund:
Corresponding Authors:
Email:
About author:

References:
Similar articles
1.XING Jian, SHAN Xuanlong, REN Xianjun, YI Jian, LIU Chaoyang and NIU Penghui.Formation mechanism of high-quality reservoirs in intermediate volcanic rocks: A case study of Longfengshan area in Songliao Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(2): 69-83
2.NIU Penghui, SHAN Xuanlong, REN Xianjun,YI Jian,LIU Chaoyang and XING Jian.Microscopic pore characteristics of andesite and implication from mineral content: A case study in Huoshiling Formation of Changling fault depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(2): 84-96
3.YUAN Qiyu, LI Yangchun, SONG Chongyu,SUN Renbin and ZHANG Xingang.Prospect for strategic minerals exploration and development, investment environment and cooperation in Mozambique[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(2): 97-108
4.WANG He and WU Qiong.Prediction of surface subsidence in Changchun City based on LSTM network[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(2): 109-115
5.ZHANG Haobin, YANG Changbao,GUO Huali and HOU Guanglei.Characteristics of land use conversion in soda saline-alkali soil region of central Northeast China[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(2): 116-125
6.XIU Chun, HUO Suxia, WANG Guogang,DUAN Haiqin, CHEN Shengtao and YAO Haiyan.Insights from coastline survey in Shandong Province, China[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(2): 126-132
7.DONG Xuri and WANG Xin.Application of artificial bee colony algorithm in Rayleigh wave inversion[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(1): 11-15
8.LUAN Yiming, HE Jinxin, DONG Yongsheng, JIANG Tian and XIAO Zhiqiang.Extraction of altered minerals from Aster remote sensing data in Gongchangling iron deposit of Liaoning, China[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(1): 16-25
9.SU Zhenning, JIAO Jian, ZHOU Shuai, YU Ping and ZHAO Xiao.Aeromagnetic compensation method based on ridge regression algorithm[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(1): 41-48
10.WANG Mingchang, ZHOU Yuyang, LI Mingjie, JI Xue and LIU Ziwei.Literature analysis of Dendrolimus disasters based on remote sensing monitoring[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(1): 49-59
11.ZHANG Lan and ZHANG Yanhong.Object-oriented crop classification based on UAV remote sensing imagery[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(1): 60-68
12.CAO Jin and LIU Yunhe.Three-dimensional magnetotelluric forward modeling using structural-point EFGM and FEM coupling method[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(1): 1-10
13.RONG Zhihao and LIU Yunhe.3D joint inversion of controlled-source audio-frequency magnetotelluric and magnetotelluric data[J]. Global Geology, 2022,25(1): 26-33
14.Shams M. Kamran,WANG Pujun,Nasar Khan and Muhammad Hassan.Organic geochemistry and source rock potential assessment of Late Paleocene Patala Formation in Margalla Hill Range,North Pakistan[J]. Global Geology, 2021,24(4): 213-225
15.Evinemi E Isaac,MAO Weijian and CHENG Shijun .Deblending by modified dictionary learning using Sparse Parameter Training[J]. Global Geology, 2021,24(4): 226-238

Copyright by Global Geology