Comparison of finite difference and pseudo- spectral methods in forward modelling based on metal ore model of random media

LIU Dongyu, HAN Liguo, ZHANG Pan and XU Dexin

Global Geology ›› 2016, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2) : 102-108.

PDF(566 KB)
PDF(566 KB)
Global Geology ›› 2016, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2) : 102-108.
论文

Comparison of finite difference and pseudo- spectral methods in forward modelling based on metal ore model of random media

  •  
Author information +
History +

Abstract

With more applications of seismic exploration in metal ore exploration,forward modelling of seismic wave has become more important in metal ore. Finite difference method and pseudo- spectral method are two im- portant methods of wave- field simulation. Results of previous studies show that both methods have distinct ad- vantages and disadvantages: Finite difference method has high precision but its dispersion is serious; pseudo- spectral method considers both computational efficiency and precision but has less precision than finite- diffe- rence. The authors consider the complex structural characteristics of the metal ore,furthermore add random media in order to simulate the complex effects produced by metal ore for wave field. First,the study introduced the theories of random media and two forward modelling methods. Second,it compared the simulation results of two methods on fault model. Then the authors established a complex metal ore model,added random media and compared computational efficiency and precision. As a result,it is found that finite difference method is better than pseudo- spectral method in precision and boundary treatment,but the computational efficiency of pseudo- spectral method is slightly higher than the finite difference method.

Key words

metal ore / random media / finite difference method / pseudo- spectral method

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Dongyu, HAN Liguo, ZHANG Pan and XU Dexin. Comparison of finite difference and pseudo- spectral methods in forward modelling based on metal ore model of random media[J]. Global Geology. 2016, 19(2): 102-108
PDF(566 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/