Research on modeling source effect of 3D CSAMT based on staggered-grid finite difference method

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-9736.2017.01.07

PDF(1003 KB)

Global Geology ›› 2017, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) : 53-58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9736.2017.01.07

Articles

Research on modeling source effect of 3D CSAMT based on staggered-grid finite difference method

ZHANG Heng, LI Tonglin

Author information +

History +

Abstract

There is usually source effect in the field work of controlled-source audio-frequency magnetotelluric method. Source effect is a thorny problem during field working, data processing and interpretation. Therefore, it is very important for the results of field prospecting to model source effect and summarize its influence rules. Based on the previous research, the authors use 3D finite difference method to simulate the electromagnetic field and set different anomaly situation to study the source effect in near-field measurement, then conclude the in-fluence rules of source effect. Simulations provide the reference for the actual field work and data processing to correct the influence of source effect, so the information of the underground will be more approaching to the real.

Key words

CSAMT / staggered-grid finite difference / source effect / three-dimensional simulation

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

ZHANG Heng, LI Tonglin. Research on modeling source effect of 3D CSAMT based on staggered-grid finite difference method[J]. Global Geology. 2017, 20(1): 53-58 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-9736.2017.01.07

References

Alumbaugh D L, Newman G A, Prevost L,et al. 1996.Three-dimensional wideband electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers.Radio Science,31(1):1-23.
Boschetto N B, Homann G W. 1991. Controlled-source audiofrequency magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies.Geophysics,56(2):255-264.
Chen M S, Yan S. 2005. Analytical study on field zones, record rules, shadow and source overprint effects in CSAMT exploration.Chinese Journal of Geophysics,48(4):1022-1031.
Deng J Z, Tan H D, Chen H,et al. 2011. CSAMT 3D mode-ling using staggered-grid finite difference method.Progress in Geophysics,26(6):2026-2032.
Kuanetzov A N. 1982. Distonting effects during eletromagnetic sounding of horizontally non-uniform media using an artificial field source.Physics of the Solid Earth,18(1):130-137.
Lei L L, Liu S X, Fu L,et al. 2012. Three-dimensional forward simulation of seabed oil and gas exploration.Global Geology,31(4):797-802. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Newman G A, Alumbaugh D L. 1995. Frequency-domain modeling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences.Geophysical Prospecting,43(8):1021-1042.
Smith J T. 1996. Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields, Part Ⅱ:Biconjugate gradient solution and an acce-lerator.Geophysics,61(5):1319-1324.
Tang J T, Ge W N. 2012. Shadow and source overprint effects in 3D CSAMT.Computing Techniques for Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration,34(1):19-26.
Wang G, Yang S, Lei D,et al. 2015. Three-dimensional si-mulation and test of source effects in CSAMT method.Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration,39(1):132-135.
Weiss C J, Constable S. 2006. Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods, Part Ⅱ——Modeling and analysis in 3D.Geophysics,71(6):G321-G332.
Yan S, Fu J M. 2004. An analytical method to estimate sha-dow and source overprint effects in CSAMT sounding. Geophysics,69(1):161-163.
Yang H B, Liang X, Chang K. 2013. Topography effects on HEM response and the correction method in frequency domain. Global Geology,32(2):379-383. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhu C, Li T L, Fan C S. 2014. Research on divergence correction method in 3D numerical modeling of 3D controlled source electromagnetic fields.Global Geology,33(4):916-924. (in Chinese with English abstract)