Global Geology 2020, 23(2) 116-122 DOI:   10.3969/j.issn.1673-9736.2020.02.05  ISSN: 1673-9736 CN: 22-1371/P

Current Issue | Archive | Search                                                            [Print]   [Close]
Articles
Information and Service
This Article
Supporting info
PDF(531KB)
[HTML]
Reference
Service and feedback
Email this article to a colleague
Add to Bookshelf
Add to Citation Manager
Cite This Article
Email Alert
Keywords
cuttings transport
underbalanced drilling
foam
Authors
PubMed

Method for predicting cuttings transport using artificial neural networks in foam drilling

PAK Kumdol1,2, PENG Jianming2, RI Jaemyong1, CHOE Kumhyok1, HO Yinchol3

1. School of Resource Exploration Engineering, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang 999093, D. P. R. Korea;
2. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
3. School of Information Science and Technology, Kim Chaek University of Technology, Pyongyang 999093, D. P. R. Korea

Abstract

Foam is used widely in underbalanced drilling for oil and gas exploration to improve well perfor-mance. Accurate prediction of the cutting transport and pressure loss in the foam drilling is an important way to prevent stuck pipe, lost circulation and to increase the rate of penetration(ROP).In foam drilling, the cuttings transport quality may be defined in terms of cuttings consistency and downhole pressure loss, which are controlled by many factors. Therefore, it is very difficult to establish the mathematical equation that reflects nonlinear relationship among various factors. The field and experimental measurements of these parameters are time consuming and costly. In this study, the authors suggest a cuttings transport mathematical modeling using BPN (back propagation network), RBFN (radial basis function network) and GRNN (general regression neural network) based on various experiment data of cuttings transport of previous researchers and compared the result with experiment data. Results of this study show that the GRNN has a correlation coefficient of 0.999 62 and an average error of 0.15 in training datasets, and a correlation coefficient of 0.998 81 and an average error of 0.612 in testing datasets, which has higher accuracy and faster training velocity than the BP network or RBFN network. GRNN can be used in many mathematical problems for accurate estimation of cuttings consistency and downhole pressure loss instead of field and experimental measurements for hydraulic design in foam drilling operation.

Keywords cuttings transport   underbalanced drilling   foam  
Received 2019-11-14 Revised 2019-12-20 Online:  
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9736.2020.02.05
Fund:
Corresponding Authors: PENG Jianming
Email: pengjm@jlu.edu.cn
About author:

References:
Similar articles

Copyright by Global Geology