[an error occurred while processing this directive] Global Geology 2019, 22(1) 29-35 DOI:   10.3969/j.issn.1673-9736.2019.01.04  ISSN: 1673-9736 CN: 22-1371/P
����Ŀ¼ | ����Ŀ¼ | ������� | �߼�����                                                            [��ӡ��ҳ]   [�ر�]
����
��չ����
������Ϣ
Supporting info
PDF(1051KB)
[HTMLȫ��]
�����[PDF]
�����
�����뷴��
�ѱ����Ƽ�������
�����ҵ����
�������ù�����
����
Email Alert
���·���
���������Ϣ
���Ĺؼ����������
Kirchhoff beam migration
prestack depth migration
coarse grid selection
beam propagator
trav-eltime calculation
���������������
PubMed
Influences of coarse grid selection on Kirchhoff beam migration
LI Jiabin1, SUN Hui1,2, ZHANG Zhihou1, HAN Fuxing3, LIU Minchen3
1. Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China;
2. School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China;
3. College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
ժҪ�� Kirchhoff beam migration is a beam migration method,which focuses on rapid imaging of geological structures.Although this imaging method ignores the amplitude information in the calculation process,it can calculate multi-arrival traveltime.This migration method takes into account both imaging accuracy and computa-tional efficiency.Kirchhoff beam migration employs coarse grid techniques in several key steps such as travel-time calculation,weight function calculation,and imaging calculation.The selection of the coarse mesh size has an important influence on the computational efficiency and imaging accuracy of the migration imaging meth-od.This paper will analyze this influence and illustrate the analysis results by the Marmousi data sets.
�ؼ����� Kirchhoff beam migration   prestack depth migration   coarse grid selection   beam propagator   trav-eltime calculation  
Influences of coarse grid selection on Kirchhoff beam migration
LI Jiabin1, SUN Hui1,2, ZHANG Zhihou1, HAN Fuxing3, LIU Minchen3
1. Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China;
2. School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China;
3. College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
Abstract: Kirchhoff beam migration is a beam migration method,which focuses on rapid imaging of geological structures.Although this imaging method ignores the amplitude information in the calculation process,it can calculate multi-arrival traveltime.This migration method takes into account both imaging accuracy and computa-tional efficiency.Kirchhoff beam migration employs coarse grid techniques in several key steps such as travel-time calculation,weight function calculation,and imaging calculation.The selection of the coarse mesh size has an important influence on the computational efficiency and imaging accuracy of the migration imaging meth-od.This paper will analyze this influence and illustrate the analysis results by the Marmousi data sets.
Keywords: Kirchhoff beam migration   prestack depth migration   coarse grid selection   beam propagator   trav-eltime calculation  
�ո����� 2018-11-02 �޻����� 2018-12-26 ����淢������  
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9736.2019.01.04
������Ŀ:

Supported by projects of the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41804100),the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No.2018M640910) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2682018CX36).

ͨѶ����: SUN Hui
���߼��:
����Email: sunhui@swjtu.edu.cn
�ο����ף�
?ervený V, Popov M M, Pšen?ík I. 1982. Computation of wave fields in inhomogeneous media-Gaussian beam ap-proach. Geophysical Journal ofthe Royal Astronomical So-ciety, 70(1):109-128.
French W S. 1975. Computer migration of oblique seismic re-flection profiles. Geophysics, 40(6):961-980.
Gray S H. 2005. Gaussian beam migration of common-shot re-cords. Geophysics, 70(4):S71-S77.
Hagedoorn J G. 1954. A process of seismic reflection interpre-tation. Geophysical Prospecting, 2(2):85-127.
Hale D. 1992. Computational aspects of Gaussian beam migra-tion. DOI:10.2172/7200248
Hale D. 1992. Migration by the Kirchhoff, slant stack, and Gaussian beam methods. DOI:10.2172/7115487
Hill N R. 1990. Gaussian beam migration. Geophysics, 55(11):1416-1428.
Hill N R. 2001. Prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration. Ge-ophysics, 66(4):1240-1250.
Liu J, Palacharla G. 2011. Multiarrival Kirchhoff beam migra-tion. Geophysics, 76(5):WB109-WB118.
Liu J, Marcinkovich C. 2013. Shot-profile Kirchhoff beam mi-gration//83th Annual International Meeting, SEG Ex-panded Abstracts.
Nowack R L, Sen M K, Stoffa P L. 2003. Gaussian beam mi-gration for sparse common-shot and common-receiver da-ta//73th Annual International Meeting, SEG Expanded Abstracts.
Schneider W A. 1978. Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions. Geophysics, 43(1):49-76.
Sun Y, Qin F, Checkles S, et al. 2000. 3-D prestack Kirch-hoff beam migration for depth imaging. Geophysics, 65(5):1592-1603.
Xu S, Lambare G, Calandra H. 2004. Fast migration/inver-sion with multivalued ray fields:Part 2-applications to the 3D SEG/EAGE salt model. Geophysics, 69 (5):1320-1328.
Xu S, Lambare G. 2004. Fast migration/inversion with multi-valued ray fields:Part 1-method, validation test, and application in 2D to Marmousi. Geophysics, 69 (5):1311-1319.
Yue Y B, Li Z C, Zhang P, et al. 2010. Prestack Gaussian beam depth migration under complex surface conditions. Applied Geophysics, 7(2):143-148.
�������������
Copyright by Global Geology