Kirchhoff beam migration is a beam migration method,which focuses on rapid imaging of geological structures.Although this imaging method ignores the amplitude information in the calculation process,it can calculate multi-arrival traveltime.This migration method takes into account both imaging accuracy and computa-tional efficiency.Kirchhoff beam migration employs coarse grid techniques in several key steps such as travel-time calculation,weight function calculation,and imaging calculation.The selection of the coarse mesh size has an important influence on the computational efficiency and imaging accuracy of the migration imaging meth-od.This paper will analyze this influence and illustrate the analysis results by the Marmousi data sets.
Abstract
Kirchhoff beam migration is a beam migration method,which focuses on rapid imaging of geological structures.Although this imaging method ignores the amplitude information in the calculation process,it can calculate multi-arrival traveltime.This migration method takes into account both imaging accuracy and computa-tional efficiency.Kirchhoff beam migration employs coarse grid techniques in several key steps such as travel-time calculation,weight function calculation,and imaging calculation.The selection of the coarse mesh size has an important influence on the computational efficiency and imaging accuracy of the migration imaging meth-od.This paper will analyze this influence and illustrate the analysis results by the Marmousi data sets.
关键词
Kirchhoff beam migration /
prestack depth migration /
coarse grid selection /
beam propagator /
trav-eltime calculation
Key words
Kirchhoff beam migration /
prestack depth migration /
coarse grid selection /
beam propagator /
trav-eltime calculation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
?ervený V, Popov M M, Pšen?ík I. 1982. Computation of wave fields in inhomogeneous media-Gaussian beam ap-proach. Geophysical Journal ofthe Royal Astronomical So-ciety, 70(1):109-128.
French W S. 1975. Computer migration of oblique seismic re-flection profiles. Geophysics, 40(6):961-980.
Gray S H. 2005. Gaussian beam migration of common-shot re-cords. Geophysics, 70(4):S71-S77.
Hagedoorn J G. 1954. A process of seismic reflection interpre-tation. Geophysical Prospecting, 2(2):85-127.
Hale D. 1992. Computational aspects of Gaussian beam migra-tion. DOI:10.2172/7200248
Hale D. 1992. Migration by the Kirchhoff, slant stack, and Gaussian beam methods. DOI:10.2172/7115487
Hill N R. 1990. Gaussian beam migration. Geophysics, 55(11):1416-1428.
Hill N R. 2001. Prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration. Ge-ophysics, 66(4):1240-1250.
Liu J, Palacharla G. 2011. Multiarrival Kirchhoff beam migra-tion. Geophysics, 76(5):WB109-WB118.
Liu J, Marcinkovich C. 2013. Shot-profile Kirchhoff beam mi-gration//83th Annual International Meeting, SEG Ex-panded Abstracts.
Nowack R L, Sen M K, Stoffa P L. 2003. Gaussian beam mi-gration for sparse common-shot and common-receiver da-ta//73th Annual International Meeting, SEG Expanded Abstracts.
Schneider W A. 1978. Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions. Geophysics, 43(1):49-76.
Sun Y, Qin F, Checkles S, et al. 2000. 3-D prestack Kirch-hoff beam migration for depth imaging. Geophysics, 65(5):1592-1603.
Xu S, Lambare G, Calandra H. 2004. Fast migration/inver-sion with multivalued ray fields:Part 2-applications to the 3D SEG/EAGE salt model. Geophysics, 69 (5):1320-1328.
Xu S, Lambare G. 2004. Fast migration/inversion with multi-valued ray fields:Part 1-method, validation test, and application in 2D to Marmousi. Geophysics, 69 (5):1311-1319.
Yue Y B, Li Z C, Zhang P, et al. 2010. Prestack Gaussian beam depth migration under complex surface conditions. Applied Geophysics, 7(2):143-148.
基金
Supported by projects of the Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41804100),the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No.2018M640910) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2682018CX36).