2023, 42(2) 399-408 DOI:     ISSN: 1004-5589 CN: 22-1111/P

Current Issue | Archive | Search                                                            [Print]   [Close]
Information and Service
This Article
Supporting info
PDF(2699KB)
[HTML]
Reference
Service and feedback
Email this article to a colleague
Add to Bookshelf
Add to Citation Manager
Cite This Article
Email Alert
Keywords
 geological hazards
susceptibility assessment
analytic hierarchy process
information quantity method
comprehensive index method
Authors
WANG Xin
WANG Xian
HAO Ye
HU Peng
HAN Xiuqing
LI Bowen
YANG Yazhou
PubMed
Article by WX
Article by Wang X
Article by Hao Y
Article by Hu P
Article by Han X
Article by Li B
Article by Yang Y

 Comparison between weighted information and comprehensive index methods on geological disaster susceptibility evaluation at Jiangcun street, Xian City

 WANG Xin, WANG Xian, HAO Ye, HU Peng, HAN Xiuqing, LI Bowen, YANG Yazhou

Shaanxi Tiandi Geology Co., Ltd., Xian 710054, China

Abstract

 In order to scientifically evaluate the geological hazard susceptibility of Jiangcun street in Xi??an, the authors have conducted detailed investigation for the geological environment and geohazard conditions at Jiang? cun street. An evaluation index system on geological hazard susceptibility has been developed, which involves 9 factors, including slope degree, direction, height, type, stratum lithologies, slope structure, distance away from fault and road, and vegetation coverage, by determining the weight of each factor using hierarchy analysis method. Based on GIS, the weighted information and comprehensive index methods are used to evaluate the vulnerability of geological hazards in the study area, respectively. The results of the two methods are compared in combination with the actual situation and ROC curve. The results show that the results of the two evaluation methods are basically consistent, with the evaluation accuracy of 92.6% and 89.5% , respectively, showing a high accuracy. However, the evaluation results of the information method are of concentrated and continued distribution features, while the concentrating degree of the comprehensive index method is relatively low. It is concluded that the evaluation results of the comprehensive index method is more consistent with the real situation of the study area.

Keywords  geological hazards   susceptibility assessment   analytic hierarchy process   information quantity method   comprehensive index method  
Received  Revised  Online:  
DOI:
Fund
Corresponding Authors:
Email:
About author:

References:
Similar articles
1.LIU Baosheng,LI Wei,LIU Jin . Ecological remediation of a collapse geological disaster in Binhu District of Wuxi City [J]. , 2023,42(3): 588-459
2.LIU Fei, QIN Sheng-wu, QIAO Shuang-shuang, DOU Qiang, HU Xiu-yu.Slope geological hazards susceptibility evaluation based on neural network model: a case study from Yongji County of Jilin Province[J]. , 2019,38(4): 1166-1176
3.LUO Han-Yu, WANG Huan, XU Hua, WANG Xi-Kui.Geological environment evaluation on East Strip Coal Mine of Fushun[J]. , 2014,33(2): 504-510
4.LOU Hao, MU Ri-Gen.Multi-objective evaluation model based on AHP in mining geotechnical engineering environmental quality[J]. , 2013,32(3): 606-611
5.WANG Ming-Peng,.Geological environmental quality evaluation in Shuyang downtown area,Jiangsu Province[J]. , 2012,31(4): 841-847
6.KONG Zhi-Zhao, DONG Shuang-Fa, JIANG Xue, ZHAO Zhao.Mine environmental assessment by analytic hierarchy process ———taking Fuxin mine as example[J]. , 2012,31(2): 420-425
7.BAO Xin-Hua, YAN Shu-Kui, SUN You-Quan, JIANG Ji-Sheng, BAO Shuo-Chao-.Optimization on Nong'an branch water supply project using comparison method and AHP[J]. , 2012,31(1): 210-217

Copyright by