2023, 42(2) 256-269 DOI:     ISSN: 1004-5589 CN: 22-1111/P

Current Issue | Archive | Search                                                            [Print]   [Close]
Information and Service
This Article
Supporting info
PDF(5759KB)
[HTML]
Reference
Service and feedback
Email this article to a colleague
Add to Bookshelf
Add to Citation Manager
Cite This Article
Email Alert
Keywords
 apatite
zircon
fission track
tectonic uplift
Meso??Cenozoic
Qinghai??Tibet Plateau
Authors
JIN Wenzheng
WANG Junpeng
BAI Wankui
YE Zhixu
PubMed
Article by JW
Article by Wang J
Article by Bai W
Article by Ye Z

 Thermochronological evidence for the differential uplift since Meso??Cenozoic in eastern Qinghai??Tibet Plateau

 JIN Wenzheng 1,2 , WANG Junpeng 3 , BAI Wankui 4 , YE Zhixu 5

 1.School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;

2.State Key Laboratory for Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China;
3.Hangzhou Institute of Petroleum Geology, PetroChina, Hangzhou 310023, China; 
4.Geophysical Research Institute of Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Branch, Dongying 257000, Shandong, China; 
5.Jidong Oilfield Branch Company, PetroChina, Tangshan 063200, Hebei, China

Abstract

 In order to quantitatively analyze the chronological order and characteristics of tectonic uplift since Meso ??Cenozoic in the northeastern part of Qinghai ??Tibet Plateau, the authors carried out fission track dating test and analysis for apatite and zircon. The results reveal that the apatite fission track ages in the study area range from (66 ± 9) Ma to (4.3 ± 1) Ma, and the zircon fission track ages range from (187 ± 11) Ma to (69 ± 4) Ma. Be? sides, the fission track ages in the northeast and east are relatively old. The tectonic uplift in the northwestern mar? gin of the study area was relatively early (200??160 Ma), while the tectonic uplift in the southeastern part was rela? tively late (140??30 Ma), and the tectonic uplift in the western part (including southwest) was the latest (90??10Ma). The overall tectonic uplift occurred after Neogene. The cooling and denudation rates of rocks are high in the west side of Guangyuan ??Jiangyou area, higher in the south side of Hongyuan ??Wenxian area, and highest near Lix? ian (23.26 ℃ / Ma and 0.78 mm / a, respectively) and this zonal variability is mainly governed by multiple regional large fracture zones.

Keywords  apatite   zircon   fission track   tectonic uplift   Meso??Cenozoic   Qinghai??Tibet Plateau  
Received  Revised  Online:  
DOI:
Fund
Corresponding Authors:
Email:
About author:

References:
Similar articles
1.MA Tianyu, ZHAO Lidong, SONG Zhitao, DONG Yanqiu, GAO Yongzhi. Natural Resources Survey Institute of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150036, China[J]. , 2023,42(3): 433-443
2.LI Xiaoyu, FENG Zhiqiang, ZHANG Qianhan, DU Bingying, ZHANG Tiean, WANG Yao, ZHANG Jiayin.  Age of the “Precambrian” Fengshuigouhe Group in Lesser Xingan Range and its tectonic implications: evidence from zircon U??Pb dating and paleontological fossils[J]. , 2023,42(2): 230-244
3.WANG Chujie,WU Zhen,WANG Guojun. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of Early Permian quartzdiorite in Aligya Forest Farm,Xing'an block[J]. , 2023,42(1): 1-10
4.WANG Xiaoliang,CHEN Jundian,CHENG Shi,WU Wenbin,LI Chao,LIU Yongjun,LI Haiyang,WANG Yuping,LYU Xing. LA--ICP--MS zircon U--Pb chronology,geochemical characteristics and geological significances of Jinjialing granite in Liaodong Peninsula[J]. , 2023,42(1): 11-25
5.LU Maoxin,TIAN Jingxiong,LI Mingtao,YAN Guoxiang,LI Liming,TAN Zhen. Evidence of tectonic uplift in northeastern margin of Tibetan Plateau: constrained by gravel of Hejiakouzi section in Zhongning County[J]. , 2023,42(1): 37-49
6.CHEN Yanbin,XIA Liyuan,WANG Xiang,WANG Yao.Zircon U--Pb dating and geochemical characteristics of Middle Permian quartz monzonite in Chahar Right Back Banner,central Inner Mongolia[J]. , 2022,41(4): 689-702
7.SONG Chen,PEI Fuping,WEI Jingyang,WANG Yipeng.Geochronology and tectonic significance of Yufutun Formation in central Jilin Province[J]. , 2022,41(4): 675-688
8.JIARenyi,DONGYongsheng,XUWang,WANGPengsen,CHENZhuo.Petrogenesis and geological implications of Early Permian bimodal volcanic rocks in Xiangtaohu area, central Qiangtang, TibetanPlateau[J]. , 2022,41(3): 465-482
9.ZHENGZhenhua,ZHANGQinshan,HELi,TIANTao,LIShenghu.LA-ICP-MSzircon U-Pb dating of Yikeguole intrusive rocks in eastern segment of East Kunlun and its geological significance[J]. , 2022,41(1): 56-71
10.YUXihuan,LIXinpeng,LIZhonghui,CHENXufeng,YINGuoliang,LIChenglu,WANGEnbao.Geochronology and geochemical characteristics of volcanic rocks of Manketou-ebo Formation in Gaodi forest farm,northern GreatXing‘an Range,and their tectonic implications[J]. , 2022,41(1): 15-25
11.HUAJiexiong,LIUHanlun.Zircon U-Pb age,geochemical characteristics and formation setting of felsite in Zhilingtou area,Zhejiang Provinc[J]. , 2022,41(1): 26-37
12.LIUYuxuan,YANGYanchen,HANShijiong,YUQiuyang.Petrogenesis of magmatic rocks from Tayuanerzhixian Pb-Zn-Cu mining area in northern segment of GreatXing‘an Range and its geological significance[J]. , 2022,41(1): 38-55
13.BAIXuerui,DONGYongsheng,CHENZhuo,JIARenyi.Geochronology of “Precambrian” meta-sedimentary rocks in Changning-Menglian tectonic belt and its geological significanc[J]. , 2021,40(4): 743-758
14.YANGZeyu,LIShanshan,HEDengyang,XIZechen,QIUKunfeng.Geochronology and petrogenesis of Paleoproterozoic mafic intrusive rocks in Miyunarea of northern North China Craton[J]. , 2021,40(4): 772-792
15.CHENHaifu,LIXiaoliang,YANZhengping,ZHANGSongtao,WANGShenglong,ZHAOJunfang,LILiang.Metallogenic timing and genesis types of Longshigeng Fe-Codeposit in eastern Kunlun Orogen,Qingha[J]. , 2021,40(4): 830-846

Copyright by