[an error occurred while processing this directive] 世界地质 2018, 37(4) 1167-1176 DOI:   10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2018.04.016  ISSN: 1004-5589 CN: 22-1111/P

本期目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索                                                            [打印本页]   [关闭]
油气地质
扩展功能
本文信息
Supporting info
PDF(742KB)
[HTML全文]
参考文献[PDF]
参考文献
服务与反馈
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
引用本文
Email Alert
文章反馈
浏览反馈信息
本文关键词相关文章
致密油
储层特征
储层评价
上干柴沟组
扎哈泉地区
柴西
本文作者相关文章
吴颜雄
薛建勤
杨智
施奇
李海鹏
刘刚
夏晓敏
PubMed
Article by Wu Y
Article by Xue J
Article by Yang Z
Article by Shi Q
Article by Li H
Article by Liu G
Article by Xia X
柴西地区扎哈泉致密油储层特征及评价
吴颜雄1, 薛建勤1, 杨智2, 施奇1, 李海鹏1, 刘刚3, 夏晓敏1
1. 中国石油青海油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 甘肃 敦煌 736200;
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
3. 中国石油青海油田分公司测试公司, 甘肃 敦煌 736200
摘要: 柴西地区致密油储层内部结构复杂、非均质性强,为了更高效地进行致密油勘探开发,利用岩芯薄片、X衍射、场发射扫描电镜、CT扫描和物性分析等方法,对扎哈泉地区上干柴沟组开展致密储层特征及储层物性控制因素研究。研究表明,上干柴沟组为典型的致密储层,以细砂岩和粉砂岩为主,填隙物含量较高,以原生孔隙为主,微米级孔隙是主要的储集空间,有效储层平均孔隙度为5.9%,平均渗透率为0.43 mD。储层内部孔隙分布较均匀,总体呈现微米级孔隙加纳米级喉道的特征,其中微米级孔隙基本呈片状分布,连通性好,纳米级孔隙则呈点孤立状分布。储层物性受原始沉积条件和后期成岩作用控制,坝砂泥质含量低,纯度高,物性较好。压实作用和碳酸盐胶结使储层变差,硬石膏胶结对孔隙的影响具有两面性,晚成岩期的溶蚀作用对储层改善作用明显。研究区致密油有效储层可分为三类,其中Ⅰ类有效储层为本区的"甜点"区,是下一步优先勘探开发的重点区块,Ⅱ-Ⅲ类有效储层则是重要的挖潜区,通过工程技术攻关可切实实现柴西地区的增产扩能。
关键词 致密油   储层特征   储层评价   上干柴沟组   扎哈泉地区   柴西  
Characteristics and evaluation of tight oil reservoirs in Zhahaquan area, western Qaidam Basin
WU Yan-xiong1, XUE Jian-qin1, YANG Zhi2, SHI Qi1, LI Hai-peng1, LIU Gang3, XIA Xiao-min1
1. Research Institute of Exploration & Development, Qinghai Oilfield, PetroChina, Dunhuang 736200, Gansu, China;
2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Well Testing Company, Qinghai Oilfield, PetroChina, Dunhuang 736200, Gansu, China
Abstract: The tight oil reservoirs in western Qaidam Basin are characterized by complicated inner structure and strong reservoir heterogeneity. In order to develop the tight oil more efficiently, the characteristics of tight oil reservoirs of upper Ganchaigou Formation in Zhahaquan area were studied through observation of thin sections, XRD, SEM and CT scan. The results show that:the upper Ganchaigou Formation is a typical tight reservoir, which mainly consists of siltstone-fine sandstone with high interstitial material. Primary porosity and micron-size pore are the most important reservoir space, and the average porosity of effective reservoir is 5.9%,average permeability is 0.43 mD. The pore throat radius varies from nano-size to micron-size, the micron-size pore shows sheet distribution with good connectivity, while the nano-size pore shows isolated distribution. The property of the reservoir is mainly controlled by deposition and diagenesis. The bar sand is with high sand content, high purity and good physical property. Compaction and carbonate cementation are the major factors that reduced the reservoir quality, while the anhydrite cementation has dual influences. The reservoir quality was improved significantly by dissolution during the late diagenetic period. Effective reservoir of tight oil can be classified into three types, of which the ClassⅠis "sweet spot" of the studied area, with best reservoir conditions and industrial oil flow can be obtained in the conventional oil test. Class Ⅱ and Ⅲ reservoirs are with poor reservoir conditions, which need fracturing to get industrial oil flow.
Keywords: tight oil   reservoir characteristics   reservoirs evaluation   Upper Ganchaigou Formation   Zhahaquan area   western Qaidam Basin  
收稿日期 2018-03-01 修回日期 2018-09-25 网络版发布日期  
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2018.04.016
基金项目:

国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05046-006)、中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项(2016E-01)联合资助.

通讯作者:
作者简介:
作者Email:

参考文献:
[1] IHS. Going global:predicting the next tight oil revolution[EB/OL].[2014-09-01]. http://www.ihs.com/products/cera.
[2] 杨华,李士祥,刘显阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11. YANG Hua, LI Shi-xiang, LIU Xian-yang. Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):1-11.
[3] 黄薇,梁江平,赵波,等. 松辽盆地北部白垩系泉头组扶余油层致密油成藏主控因素[J]. 古地理学报,2013,15(5):635-644. HUANG Wei, LIANG Jiang-ping, ZHAO Bo, et al. Main controlling factors of tight oil accumulations in the Fuyu Layer of Cretaceous Quantou Formation in northern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013, 15(5):635-644.
[4] 陈世加,张焕旭,路俊刚,等. 川中侏罗系大安寨段致密油富集高产控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2):1-8. CHEN Shi-jia, ZHANG Huan-xu, LU Jun-gang, et al. Controlling factors of Jurassic Da'anzhai tight oil accumulation and high production in central Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2):1-8.
[5] 宋涛,李建忠,姜晓宇,等. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷束鹿凹陷泥灰岩源储一体式致密油成藏特征[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2013,37(6):47-53. SONG Tao, LI Jian-zhong, JIANG Xiao-yu, et al. Features of marl tight oil in source rock and reservoir in Shulu Sag of central Hebei depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2013, 37(6):47-53.
[6] 梁浩,李新宁,马强,等. 三塘湖盆地条湖组致密油地质特征及勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014,41(5):563-572. LIANG Hao, LI Xin-ning, MA Qiang, et al. Geological features and exploration potential of Permian Tiaohu Formation tight oil, Santanghu Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(5):563-572.
[7] 匡立春,唐勇,雷德文,等. 准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):657-667. KUANG Li-chun, TANG Yong, LEI De-wen, et al. Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6):657-667.
[8] 贾承造,郑明,张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136. JIA Cheng-zao, ZHENG Ming, ZHANG Yong-feng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in the prospect of exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2):129-136.
[9] 邹才能,翟光明,张光亚,等. 全球常规-非常规油气形成分布:资源潜力及趋势预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):13-25. ZOU Cai-neng, ZHAI Guang-ming, ZHANG Guang-ya, et al. Formation, distribution, potential and prediction of global conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1):13-25.
[10] BP. BP energy outlook 2035[EB/OL]. (2014-05-08)[2016-06-28]. http://wwwbpcom/en/global/corporate/about-bp/energy-economics/energy-outlookhtml.
[11] 付锁堂,张道伟,薛建勤,等. 柴达木盆地致密油形成的地质条件及勘探潜力分析[J]. 沉积学报,2013,31(4):672-681. FU Suo-tang, ZHANG Dao-wei, XUE Jian-qin, et al. Exploration potential and geological conditions of tight oil in the Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(4):672-681.
[12] 张连梁,段胜强,李会光,等. 扎哈泉地区新近系致密油形成条件与分布特征[J]. 特种油气藏,2016,23(2):36-40. ZHANG Lian-liang, DUAN Sheng-qiang, LI Hui-guang, et al. Neogene tight oil accumulation condition and distribution in Zhahaquan[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2016, 23(2):36-40.
[13] 田继先,曾旭,易士威,等. 咸化湖盆致密油储层"甜点"预测方法研究:以柴达木盆地扎哈泉地区上干柴沟组为例[J]. 地学前缘,2016,23(5):193-201. TIAN Ji-xian, ZENG Xu, YI Shi-wei, et al. The prediction method of the tight oil reservoirs "sweet spot" in saline lacustrine basin:a case study of the upper Ganchaigou Formation in the Zhahaquan district of Qaidam Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(5):193-201.
[14] 沈亚,李洪革,管俊亚,等. 柴西地区古近系-新近系含油凹陷构造特征与勘探领域[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2012,47(增刊1):111-117. SHEN Ya, LI Hong-ge, GUAN Jun-ya, et al. Sructure features and exploration potential of the Paleogene-Neogene depression in Western Qaidam Basin[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 47(Suppl.1):111-117.
[15] 杨竞,周莉,张鹏,等. 柴达木盆地红沟子构造沟7井区烃源岩评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2008,15(2):61-66. YANG Jing, ZHOU Li, ZHANG Peng, et al. Evaluation of source rocks in Gou7 well block of Honggouzi structure, Qaidam Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(2):61-66.
[16] 付锁堂. 柴达木盆地西部油气成藏主控因素与有利勘探方向[J]. 沉积学报,2010,28(2):373-379. FU Suo-tang. Key controlling factors of oil and gas accumulation in the western Qaidam Basin and its implications for favorable exploration direction[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(2):373-379.
[17] 路俊刚,陈世加,欧成华,等. 柴达木盆地西部北区干柴沟地区深层勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2010,32(2):136-139,146. LU Jun-gang, CHEN Shi-jia, OU Cheng-hua, et al. The deep reservoir exploration analysis in the Ganchaigou Formation of north area of western Qaidam Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2010, 32(2):136-139,146.
[18] 杨晓萍,赵文智,邹才能,等. 低渗透储层成因及优质储层形成与分布[J]. 石油学报,2007,28(4):57-61. YANG Xiao-ping, ZHAO Wen-zhi, ZOU Cai-neng, et al. Origin of low-permeability reservoir and distribution of favorable reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(4):57-61.
[19] 刘伟,林承焰,王国民,等. 柴西北地区油泉子油田低渗透储层特征与成因分析[J]. 石油学报,2009,30(3):417-421. LIU Wei, LIN Cheng-yan, WANG Guo-min, et al. Characteristics of low-permeability reservoir and its origin in Youquanzi oilfield in the northwest part of Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(3):417-421.
[20] 邢新亚,林承焰,王东仁,等. 低渗透油藏网状河道岔道口优质储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):29-33,41. XING Xin-ya, LIN Cheng-yan, WANG Dong-ren, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of favorable reservoirs in braided channel crotch of low-pemeability reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015, 22(3):29-33,41.
本刊中的类似文章
1.冷庆磊, 朱建峰, 刘玉虎 . 松辽盆地南部查干花次凹下白垩统火山岩储层特征与发育规律 [J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(3): 527-535
2.方旭庆,曲希玉,刘英男,苗长盛. 东营北带盐家—永安地区沙四上亚段物源区构造背景 及其储层差异性[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 80-91
3.康德江.松辽盆地北部源下致密油成藏源岩下限与分类标准[J]. 世界地质, 2021,40(4): 889-897
4.刘国东.通化盆地三棵榆树断陷下白垩统鹰嘴砬子组储层特征[J]. 世界地质, 2020,39(3): 610-616
5.王建飞.辽河东部凹陷火成岩岩性识别及储层评价[J]. 世界地质, 2019,38(2): 412-419
6.刘丽娟.松辽盆地北部扶余油层致密油资源评价参数体系及标准研究[J]. 世界地质, 2019,38(1): 225-233
7.师政, 陆建林, 王晔磊.渤海湾盆地南堡地区碳酸盐岩内幕储层特征及测井识别[J]. 世界地质, 2018,37(4): 1187-1196
8.刘春燕,李松,孙冬胜,刘志远,邱桂强,冯鑫.致密砂岩储层非均质性及有效储层表征:以鄂尔多斯盆地南部彬长地区三叠系延长组长7段为例[J]. 世界地质, 2017,36(4): 1170-1180
9.师江波.塔木察格盆地南贝尔凹陷塔Ⅱ油层组火山碎屑岩储层特征研究[J]. 世界地质, 2017,36(1): 195-201
10.汪海燕.致密油分布的沉积相控作用分析: 以齐家地区高台子油层为例[J]. 世界地质, 2016,35(3): 801-808
11.林斌, 郭巍, 李成博, 金珍花, 王少华.塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区泥盆系储层特征及影响因素[J]. 世界地质, 2014,33(1): 120-136
12.张勇, 董清水, 李赫, 张凯文, 陈吉平, 刘辉.伊通盆地莫里青断陷伊59 井区双二段储层含油性研究[J]. 世界地质, 2012,31(4): 740-747
13.王建鹏,刘招君,苗长盛,方石,陈永成.蒙古塔木察格盆地塔南凹陷下白垩统南屯组三角洲沉积及储层特征[J]. 世界地质, 2011,30(3): 415-428
14.王亚东,张涛,李仕远,郑建京,郭建明,孙国强.地震剖面记录的柴达木盆地西部地区新生代构造变形特征[J]. 世界地质, 2011,30(2): 213-223

Copyright by 世界地质