[an error occurred while processing this directive] ������� 2017, 36(2) 560-569 DOI:   10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2017.02.022  ISSN: 1004-5589 CN: 22-1111/P

����Ŀ¼ | ����Ŀ¼ | ������� | �߼�����                                                            [��ӡ��ҳ]   [�ر�]
��������
��չ����
������Ϣ
Supporting info
PDF(5960KB)
[HTMLȫ��]
�����[PDF]
�����
�����뷴��
�ѱ����Ƽ�������
�����ҵ����
�������ù�����
����
Email Alert
���·���
���������Ϣ
���Ĺؼ����������
tilt-depth��
�϶�����
������
������
��ׯ����
���������������
PubMed
Tilt-depth�����������о�����Ӧ��
��ΰƽ, �����, �, ������, κ����, �, �˾���
��������ѧ�����Ե����뿱̽���������ص�ѧ��ʵ����, �ϲ� 330013
ժҪ��

Tilt-depth������һ�ֿ��Կ��ٷ��ݴ�Դ�϶���ȵ����˷�������ά����άģ�����������tilt-depth������������������϶������ȼ�ˮƽ�߶Ⱦ��йأ�ͬʱ�����쳣Ҳ��Է��ݽ������Ӱ�졣ʵ���У���tilt-depth��Ӧ���ڹ㶫ʡ��ׯ���ﺽ�����ݷ����У�tilt�ݶ�ͼ��չʾ�����������ԵĽ��������������쳣���ƶ�Ϊdz�����Ի��������������γɣ��������������ߴ��쳣����11��λ�õĴ�Դ�϶�������ݽ����ʾ����ׯ�����ڱ���ߴ�������Ƚ�dz���Ҿ�����dz����Ĺ������������ϲ�ߴ������ģ�ϴ�������Ϻ�Ϊ�������������ṩ���������ݡ�

�ؼ����� tilt-depth��   �϶�����   ������   ������   ��ׯ����  
Applicability of tilt-depth method and its application
CAO Wei-ping, WANG Yan-guo, YANG Bo, LIU Jian-peng, WEI Bo-yang, LI Kang, DENG Ju-zhi
Fundamental Science on Radioactive Geology and Exploration Technology Laboratory, East China Unversity of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
Abstract:

Tilt-depth method is a new inversion method for fast estimation of the top depths of magnetic bodies. Two- and three-dimensional model tests show that the inversion error of tilt-depth method is related to the top depth, thickness and horizontal scale of geological body. In addition, superimposed anomaly also has an effect on the inversion results. Tilt-depth method is applied to the aeromagnetic data over Xiazhuang ore field in Guangdong, and the authors find that two near EW-trending anomaly zones on tilt map are produced from deep ultrabasic diabase. Tilt-depth method is used to invert top depths of 11 inversion points on the two high magnetic anomaly zones in the tilt map. Based on the inversion results, the authors found that the depth of magnetic body located in the north of the Xiazhuang ore field is relatively shallow and is getting deeper from south to north, whereas the magnetic body in the south of the Xiazhuang ore field is relatively deeper and with larger scale. This important information is very useful for the deep mineral exploration.

Keywords: tilt-depth method   top buried depth   applicability   relative error   Xiazhuang ore field  
�ո����� 2016-07-18 �޻����� 2017-01-07 ����淢������  
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2017.02.022
������Ŀ:

������Ȼ��ѧ����41504098��41504054���������ƹ�ί������Ŀ���ƹ���2013[969]�ţ���������.

ͨѶ����: �����(1985),��,��ʦ,��Ҫ���¿�̽��������ѧ����Ľ�ѧ����й���.E-mail:wangyg8503@126.com
���߼��:
����Email: wangyg8503@126.com

�ο����ף�

[1] �ź���,������,����ɽ. �������Ա�׼����������ش�Դ�߽� [J]. ��������ѧ��,2011,54 (7): 1921-1927. ZHANG Heng-lei, LIU Tian-you, YANG Yu-shan. Calculation of gravity and magnetic source boundary based on anisotropy normalized variance [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54 (7): 1921-1927.
[2] �ź���,������,������. ���ڶ��׵����Ĵ�Դ�߽��붥����ȿ��ٷ��� [J]. ��������ѧ��,2012, 55 (11): 3839-3847. ZHANG Heng-lei, HU Xiang-yun, LIU Tian-you. Fast inversion of magnetic source boundary and top depth via second order derivative [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55 (11): 3839-3847.
[3] Thompson D T. EULDPH: a new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data [J]. Geophysics, 1982, 47: 31-37.
[4] Reid A B, Allsop J M, Granser H, et al. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution [J]. Geophysics, 1990, 55: 80-91.
[5] ������,������,����ѩ,��. ������ݶȲ����ڿ��������ˮ�ܵ��е�Ӧ�� [J]. �������,2014, 33 (3): 659-665. REN Xiu-yan, DU Xiao-juan, SUN Rui-xue, et al. Application of ground magnetic gradient in underground sewage pipe survey [J]. Global Geology, 2014, 33 (3): 659-665.
[6] �ŷ���,����˳,�ŷ���,��. ����Hilbert�任����������һ�����ݶ� [J]. ��������ѧ��, 2005, 48 (3): 704-709. ZHANG Feng-xun, MENG Ling-shun, ZHANG Feng-qin, et al. Calculating normalized full gradient of gravity anomaly using Hilbert transform [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2005, 48(3): 704-709.
[7] ���Ӳ�,�ŷ���,�����,��. ����̩�ռ���������������һ�����ݶ� [J]. �������,2012, 31 (4): 824-830. GUO Can-can, ZHANG Feng-xu, WANG Yan-guo, et al. Calculating normalized full gradient of gravity anomalies using Taylor series iteration [J]. Global Geology, 2012, 31 (4): 824-830.
[8] �ճ�,������,�����,��. ����ƽ��������һ�����ݶ���ɽ����Զ���ɿ�����Ӧ�� [J]. �������,33 (4): 889-894. SU Chao, DU Xiao-juan, MA Guo-qing, et al. Application of normalized full gradient method with geometric mean in mined-out area of Zhaoyuan gold deposit in Shandong [J]. Global Geology, 2014, 33 (4): 889-894.
[9] ����,Ѧ�ָ�,���,��. ��ɽ-��Ϫ����̫����ᾧ�������� [J]. �������,2016,35 (2): 387-394. WANG Yu, XUE Lin-fu, PENG Chong, et al. Buried depth of Archean crystalline basement in Anshan-Benxi area [J]. Global Geology, 2016, 35(2): 387-394.
[10] ����ˮ,�ŷ���,���ѷ�. ���˰��뱱�εĵ��������о� [J]. �������,2016, 34 (1): 187-193. YU Qing-shui, ZHANG Feng-xu, ZENG Zhao-fa. Research on geophysical field in northern part of Da Hinggan mountains [J]. Global Geology, 2016, 34 (1): 187-193.
[11] Salem A, Williams S E, Fairhead J D, et al. Tilt-depth method: a simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives [J]. The leading Edge, 2007, 26: 1502-1505.
[12] Nabighian M N. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation [J]. Geophysics, 1972, 37(3): 507-517.
[13] Miller H G, Singh V. Potential field tilt: a new concept for location of potential field sources [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 1994, 32: 213-217.
[14] Salem A, Williams S E, Fairhead J D, et al. Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt-angle derivatives [J]. Geophysics, 2008, 73 (1): 1-10.
[15] Lee M, Morris W, Ugalde H. Amplitude effects of magntic signals on depth estimations [C]. 11th SAGA Biennial Technical Meeting and Exhibition, Swaziland, 2009(16/18): 276-279.
[16] Lahti I, Karinen T. Tilt derivative multiscale edges of magnetic data [J]. The Leading edge, 2010, 29 (1): 24-29.
[17] Fairhead J D, Salem A, Cascone L, et al. New developments of the magnetic tilt-depth method to improve structural mapping of sedimentary basins [J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2011, 59 (6): 1072-1086.
[18] WANG Yan-guo, ZHANG Jin, GE Kun-peng, et al. Improve tilt-depth method for fast estimation of top and bottom depths of magnetic bodies [J]. Applied Geophysics, 2016, 13(2): 249-256.
[19] ����,��ʢ��,�ڳ���. Tilt-depth������Ӧ�� [J]. ��̽�뻯̽,2009, 33 (5): 583-586. GUO Hua, XIONG Sheng-qing, YU Chang-chun. The application of tilt-depth technology [J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2009, 33 (5): 583-586.
[20] Salem A, Williams S E, Samson E, et al. Sedimentary basins reconnaissance using the magnetic tilt-depth method [J]. Exploration Geophysics, 2010, 41: 198-209.
[21] ����,��ƽ,л���. ����Tilt-depth��ȡ�����ȼ���߽�λ�õĹ�ϵ�о� [J]. ��������ѧ��չ,2012,27 (5): 2151-2159. GUO Hua, WANG Ping, XIE Ru-kuan. The relationship of the boundary and the depth computed with the method of tilt-depth [J]. Progree in Geophysics, 2012, 27 (5): 2151-2159.
[22] Cooper G R J. A gradient-ratio method for the semi-automatic interpretation of gravity map data sets [J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 60: 995-1000.
[23] Zhou S, Huang D N. Determining the depth of certain gravity sources without a priori specification of their structural index [J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2015, 122: 172-180.
[24] Cooper G R J. The automatic determination of the location, depth, and dip of contacts from aeromagnetic data [J]. Geophysics, 2014, 79 (3): 35-41.
[25] ������,����ѵ,����,��. ��ׯ�����˳ɿ��������ҿ���˼· [J]. �˿����,2010, 26 (5): 277-282. LAI Zhong-xin, WANG Lian-xun, ZHOU Rui, et al. Metallogenic and new prospecting direction for Xiazhuang uranium mine area [J]. Uranium Geology, 2010, 26 (5): 277-282.
[26] �ε±�,���꺣,����. ��ׯ�˿���ɿ�ģʽ [J]. �˿����,2016, 32 (3): 152-158. HE De-bao, FAN Hong-hai, WANG Yu. Metallogenic model in Xiazhuang uranium ore field [J]. Uranium Geology, 2016, 32 (3): 152-158.

�������������

Copyright by �������