[an error occurred while processing this directive] 世界地质 2022, 41(4) 780-792 DOI:     ISSN: 1004-5589 CN: 22-1111/P

本期目录 | 下期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索                                                            [打印本页]   [关闭]
基础地质
扩展功能
本文信息
Supporting info
PDF(1423KB)
[HTML全文]
参考文献[PDF]
参考文献
服务与反馈
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
引用本文
Email Alert
文章反馈
浏览反馈信息
本文关键词相关文章
 
页岩油
岩性组合
有利区评价
长 73 亚段
长武&mdash
富县地区
鄂尔多斯盆地
本文作者相关文章
边瑞康
刘光祥
刘忠宝
赵俊兴
邓昆
金思丁
李鹏
PubMed
Article by Bian R
Article by Liu G
Article by Liu Z
Article by Zhao J
Article by Deng K
Article by Jin S
Article by Li P
 鄂尔多斯盆地长武—富县地区长 73 亚段岩性组合特征 及页岩油有利区评价
 边瑞康1 ,刘光祥1 ,刘忠宝1 ,赵俊兴2 ,邓昆3 ,金思丁3 ,李鹏1
 1. 中国石化 石油勘探开发研究院,北京 102206;
2. 成都理工大学 沉积地质研究院,成都 610059;
3. 成都理工大学 能源学院,成都 610059
摘要:  通过对长武—富县地区钻井和露头长 73 亚段开展岩性描述、薄片鉴定、X--射线衍射等分析, 识别出 5 种主要泥页岩岩性类型,分别为黏土质页岩、含凝灰黏土质页岩、凝灰质黏土质页岩、含粉 砂黏土质泥岩和粉砂质黏土质泥岩; 同时识别出 3 种主要夹层岩性类型,分别为细砂岩、凝灰岩和沉 凝灰岩。在统计分析基础之上,划分了 4 种主要岩性组合类型,即纯泥页岩型、泥页岩夹砂岩型、泥 页岩夹凝灰岩型、泥页岩夹砂岩和凝灰岩型,并明确了不同类型岩性组合的分布特点。对黏土质页岩 和含粉砂黏土质泥岩 2 种主要泥页岩类型开展生烃特征评价,认为 2 种泥页岩的有机质丰度和热成熟 度均达到了页岩油形成的标准,含油性指标也显示其达到了页岩油资源富集级别。储层物性特征评价 认为,相对于泥页岩,细砂岩和凝灰岩类夹层具有更优的物性条件,因此夹层发育对于提高泥页岩层 段整体物性条件具有积极作用,且细砂岩夹层起到的积极作用更大。勘探有利区评价认为,研究区泥 页岩一类有利区主要分布在张村驿—张家湾、上畛子林场、安置农场等地区,其中张村驿泥页岩夹砂 岩型岩性组合发育区为最有利勘探目标,其次为上畛子林场、安置农场泥页岩夹凝灰岩型勘探目标, 以及张家湾纯泥页岩型勘探目标。
关键词     页岩油   岩性组合   有利区评价   长 73 亚段   长武&mdash   富县地区   鄂尔多斯盆地  
 Lithologic assemblage characteristics and shale oil favorable area evaluation of Chang 73 sub-member in Changwu--Fuxian area,Ordos Basin
 BIAN Ruikang1 ,LIU Guangxiang1 ,LIU Zhongbao1 ,ZHAO Junxing2 ,DENG Kun3 ,JIN Siding3 ,LI Peng1
 1. Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute,SINOPEC,Beijing 102206,China;
2. Institute of Sedimentary Geology,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China; 3. College of Energy,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China
Abstract:  Through lithology description,thin section identification and X--ray diffraction analysis of drillings and outcrops of the Chang 73 sub-member in Changwu--Fuxian area,five main shale lithology types are identified, namely clay shale,tuff-bearing clay shale,tuffaceous clay shale,silt-bearing clay mudstone and silty clay mud-stone. At the same time,three main interlayer lithology types are identified,namely fine sandstone,tuff and sedimentary tuff. On the basis of statistical analysis,four main types of lithologic assemblages are divided,namely pure shale type,shale with sandstone type,shale with tuff type,shale with sandstone and tuff type,and the distribution characteristics of different types of lithologic assemblages are defined. The hydrocarbon generation characteristics of clay shale and silt-bearing clay mudstone are evaluated. It is considered that the organic matter abundance and thermal maturity of the two kinds of shale meet the standard of shale oil formation,and the oil-bearing index also shows that they have reached the enrichment level of shale oil resources. According to the evaluation of reservoir physical property characteristics,compared with shale,fine sandstone and tuff interlayer have better physical property conditions. Therefore,interlayer development plays a positive role in improving the overall physical property conditions of shale section,and fine sandstone interlayer plays a greater positive role. According to the evaluation of favorable exploration areas,the first-class favorable areas of shale in the study region are mainly distributed in Zhangcunyi--Zhangjiawan,Shangzhenzi forest farm,Anzhi farm and other areas. Among them,the development area of shale with sandstone type in Zhangcunyi is the most favorable exploration target,followed by the exploration target of shale with tuff type in Shangzhenzi forest farm and Anzhi farm,as well as the exploration target of pure shale type in Zhangjiawan.
Keywords:  shale oil   lithologic assemblages   favorable area evaluation   Chang 73 sub-member   Changwu-- Fuxian area   Ordos Basin  
收稿日期  修回日期  网络版发布日期  
DOI:
基金项目:

 

通讯作者:
作者简介:
作者Email:

参考文献:
 
本刊中的类似文章
1.王晓亮,陈军典,程识,吴文彬,李超,刘永俊,李海洋,王玉平,吕行. 辽东半岛金家岭花岗岩体 LA--ICP--MS 锆石 U--Pb 年代学、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 11-25
2.方旭庆,曲希玉,刘英男,苗长盛. 东营北带盐家—永安地区沙四上亚段物源区构造背景 及其储层差异性[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 80-91
3.贾培蒙,林鹤鸣,刘培,邱欣卫,沈梦蓉,郝国丽,徐川. 珠江口盆地恩平 13--14 洼文昌期构造转换 及其对沉积充填的控制作用[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 92-103
4.王华,戴建文,文鑫,马肖琳,郑伟,刘旭东,杨少春. 阳江凹陷 X 油田珠江组低渗透储层特征及主控因素[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 116-125
5.王少博,商祥. 基于多波勘探的跨孔 CT 交叉梯度联合反演算法[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 146-152
6.王楚杰,武振,王国君. 兴安地块阿力格亚林场早二叠世石英闪长岩的成因 及构造意义[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 1-10
7.刘希雯,王锶淼,高妍,张彦龙,赵春晖,范颖鑫,杨浩. 黑龙江依兰地区早白垩世花岗岩的年代学及地球化学特征[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 26-36
8.郭国海,姜宇,黄晋荣. 山西五台山—恒山太古代绿岩带金矿及其典型矿床地质特征[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 50-60
9.孙洋,胡平,赵晓阳. 吉林大口钦—缸窑一带黏土岩成矿远景评价[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 61-68
10.陶文芳,彭光荣,李洪博,张青林,曾婷,牛鹏. 珠江口盆地珠四坳陷裂陷结构差异及成因机制[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 104-115
11.杨元芸,张盼,苏晓轶,韩立国,尚旭佳,周奕秀. 不依赖震源的归一化全局能量互相关全波形反演[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 134-145
12.蔡霞,蔡琳,解建强,王咏梅,李锐锋,李智才. 山西省地表温度时空变化及其与地质灾害的关系分析[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 203-212
13.刘忠宝,李鹏,刘光祥,李雄,刘晧天,王鹏威,郝景宇,李倩文. 川东北地区自流井组页岩有机地球化学特征 及油气勘探意义[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 69-79
14.张丽华,李庆峰,单刚义,李洪征,潘保芝,许凤鸣. 方解石的润湿性对胶结指数 m 影响的实验研究[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 126-133
15.闫潮辉,于子望. 基于时间序列 LSTM 算法对渗流条件下地埋管间距的优化[J]. 世界地质, 2023,42(1): 153-158

Copyright by 世界地质